Energy: Asset Maintenance Log Review with Claude Code: Result JSON Schema
A production playbook for asset maintenance log review in energy operations using Claude Code: result json schema, run-scoped inputs, logs, typed results, and artifacts.
Audience: Energy and industrial maintenance teams
The problem
Energy and industrial maintenance teams need asset maintenance log review to run repeatedly against maintenance logs, sensor exports, work orders, and failure reports. In energy operations, the pain is not one good answer; it is repeatability, auditability, exception handling, and evidence that survives handoff.
Implementation path
Define the outer result contract once, let the asset maintenance log review skill own body.data, and reject terminal output that does not match the expected schema.
Tradeoffs and failure modes
Schema enforcement adds upfront design work, but removes prompt parsing from the product surface. For asset maintenance log review, the practical test is whether a second run can be debugged, retried, and consumed by a product without reading the raw agent transcript.
Result shape
{
"schema_version": "argo.result.v1",
"summary": "asset maintenance log review completed",
"body": { "type": "energy_asset_maintenance_log_review", "data": {}, "exceptions": [] },
"artifacts": []
}
Run this on Argo