Energy: Asset Maintenance Log Review with Claude Code: Artifact Delivery
A production playbook for asset maintenance log review in energy operations using Claude Code: artifact delivery, run-scoped inputs, logs, typed results, and artifacts.
Audience: Energy and industrial maintenance teams
The problem
Energy and industrial maintenance teams need asset maintenance log review to run repeatedly against maintenance logs, sensor exports, work orders, and failure reports. In energy operations, the pain is not one good answer; it is repeatability, auditability, exception handling, and evidence that survives handoff.
Implementation path
Require Claude Code to write customer-visible files under /skill/output/artifacts, validate filenames and sizes, then return signed artifact metadata in argo.result.v1.
Tradeoffs and failure modes
Artifact policy constrains file output, but customers receive files that are durable, typed, and safe to download. For asset maintenance log review, the practical test is whether a second run can be debugged, retried, and consumed by a product without reading the raw agent transcript.
Artifact manifest
artifacts:
- energy-asset-maintenance-log-review-summary.md
- energy-asset-maintenance-log-review-evidence.csv
- energy-asset-maintenance-log-review-review.json
signed_urls: true
retention: org_policy
Run this on Argo