Tool Permission Review with Claude Code: Artifact Delivery
A production playbook for tool permission review in cross-industry operations using Claude Code: artifact delivery, run-scoped inputs, logs, typed results, and artifacts.
Audience: Security reviewers for AI tools
The problem
Security reviewers for AI tools need tool permission review to run repeatedly against tool manifests, scopes, auth flows, and usage logs. In cross-industry operations, the pain is not one good answer; it is repeatability, auditability, exception handling, and evidence that survives handoff.
Implementation path
Require Claude Code to write customer-visible files under /skill/output/artifacts, validate filenames and sizes, then return signed artifact metadata in argo.result.v1.
Tradeoffs and failure modes
Artifact policy constrains file output, but customers receive files that are durable, typed, and safe to download. For tool permission review, the practical test is whether a second run can be debugged, retried, and consumed by a product without reading the raw agent transcript.
Artifact manifest
artifacts:
- tool-permission-review-summary.md
- tool-permission-review-evidence.csv
- tool-permission-review-review.json
signed_urls: true
retention: org_policy
Run this on Argo