Travel Disruption Claim Review with Claude Code: Cost Controls
A production playbook for travel disruption claim review in travel operations using Claude Code: cost controls, run-scoped inputs, logs, typed results, and artifacts.
Audience: Travel and airline operations teams
The problem
Travel and airline operations teams need travel disruption claim review to run repeatedly against itineraries, delay records, receipts, policies, and customer messages. In travel operations, the pain is not one good answer; it is repeatability, auditability, exception handling, and evidence that survives handoff.
Implementation path
Set explicit limits for travel disruption claim review: input size, run time, tool calls, artifacts, retries, and concurrent runs per organization.
Tradeoffs and failure modes
Limits reject pathological runs, but they keep one workflow from turning into an unbounded infrastructure bill. For travel disruption claim review, the practical test is whether a second run can be debugged, retried, and consumed by a product without reading the raw agent transcript.
Run limits
max_run_seconds=1800
max_input_bytes=104857600
max_artifact_bytes=104857600
max_tool_calls=120
retry_after_seconds=60
Run this on Argo