Travel Disruption Claim Review with Claude Code: Human Review Queue
A production playbook for travel disruption claim review in travel operations using Claude Code: human review queue, run-scoped inputs, logs, typed results, and artifacts.
Audience: Travel and airline operations teams
The problem
Travel and airline operations teams need travel disruption claim review to run repeatedly against itineraries, delay records, receipts, policies, and customer messages. In travel operations, the pain is not one good answer; it is repeatability, auditability, exception handling, and evidence that survives handoff.
Implementation path
Split the travel disruption claim review result into automatable fields and review-only exceptions, then send low-confidence cases to a human queue with evidence artifacts attached.
Tradeoffs and failure modes
Human review slows a subset of runs, but it lets the workflow ship before every edge case is fully automated. For travel disruption claim review, the practical test is whether a second run can be debugged, retried, and consumed by a product without reading the raw agent transcript.
Review handoff
review_status: needs_review | approved | rejected
review_reason: string
source_evidence: artifact_url[]
agent: Claude Code
workflow: travel-disruption-claim-review
Run this on Argo