Manufacturing: Non-Conformance Report Review with Claude Code: Sandbox Policy

A production playbook for non-conformance report review in manufacturing operations using Claude Code: sandbox policy, run-scoped inputs, logs, typed results, and artifacts.

Audience: Manufacturing quality teams

The problem

Manufacturing quality teams need non-conformance report review to run repeatedly against NCRs, inspection records, photos, supplier notes, and corrective action rules. In manufacturing operations, the pain is not one good answer; it is repeatability, auditability, exception handling, and evidence that survives handoff.

Implementation path

Run non-conformance report review in an ephemeral sandbox, keep provider credentials in the broker, expose narrow tools, and store logs outside the workspace for review.

Tradeoffs and failure modes

A narrower runtime blocks ambient machine behavior, but it gives security reviewers a concrete boundary. For non-conformance report review, the practical test is whether a second run can be debugged, retried, and consumed by a product without reading the raw agent transcript.

Runtime boundary

filesystem: /skill and /skill/.argo/inputs only
network: deny by default
artifacts: /skill/output/artifacts
logs: retained outside sandbox
provider: Claude Code

Run this on Argo