Energy: Asset Maintenance Log Review with Claude Code: MCP Tool Boundary
A production playbook for asset maintenance log review in energy operations using Claude Code: mcp tool boundary, run-scoped inputs, logs, typed results, and artifacts.
Audience: Energy and industrial maintenance teams
The problem
Energy and industrial maintenance teams need asset maintenance log review to run repeatedly against maintenance logs, sensor exports, work orders, and failure reports. In energy operations, the pain is not one good answer; it is repeatability, auditability, exception handling, and evidence that survives handoff.
Implementation path
Expose only the MCP tools needed for asset maintenance log review, validate tool arguments, keep credentials in the owning service, and log each call outside the sandbox.
Tradeoffs and failure modes
Narrow tool boundaries reduce agent flexibility, but make the integration reviewable and supportable. For asset maintenance log review, the practical test is whether a second run can be debugged, retried, and consumed by a product without reading the raw agent transcript.
Tool policy
tool: energy-asset-maintenance-log-review_lookup
agent: Claude Code
input_scope: /skill/.argo/inputs
credential_owner: broker
log_arguments: true
network_policy: allowlisted
Run this on Argo